Heidegger Was Right
Well, not about everything, the Nazi s***head, but in his assertion that the world--that Life--is big and inscrutable and amorphous and chaotic and unpredictable and that we, humanity, just can't function in such a place--that we find it overwhelming and horrifying and dizzying to the point of nausea. Who am I? Why am I here? What do I mean by "here"? (Most people don't know, but the inner monologue of the falling whale in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is actually a neat little joke on the concept of Heideggerian thrown-ness--no, really, it is! Remember, the English system of education is much, much better than ours, which is why the Pythons could do jokes about Latin conjugation/declension in Life of Brian and assume that their audience would 'get it.')
So, like that sweet, doomed whale, we create means of orientation. Points in space, time, and self about which we can say "That is There, I am Here, and This is How I Relate To It." Why else do you think so much of our language hinges on prepositions--words that exist only to articulate relations between things: "at," "from," "of," "to" and so on? Because in order to get our head straight, we have to put the rest of our world in order. Why else is moving homes so disturbing and stressful? Because it's a change of a lynchpin in how we organize the world--we think spatially--think about how every place in the world is, in ways distinct and vague, organized around the basic principle of 'where it is in relation to your home'--and not just in terms of geography. Our emotional lives are essentially matters of spatial orientation as well. Which--thank Christ--brings me to my point.
After traumatic losses, we lose our minds because we can't function without the presence of, say, our loved one--who that person was, what that person meant--that makes up too much of how we think about our lives as being ordered. Pause and consider, dear reader--don't you have someone who is, so to speak, your conscience--the eprson you consult whenever you're at a loss? Your dangerous side--the person you know you can go to for fun of the 'heh heh' variety? Your sense of humor--the person who 'gets' you and laughs at the same things in the same way and who you have to share every new joke immediately? Your something close and dear and meaningful--your sense of self in some embodied, beloved way? Bet you do. Bet you got a lot of them. I know I do. I have, for instance, one friend who is more of an achor to me than he'd ever be comfortable knowing--but he's the one I know I can go to when the s*** hits the fan (and it has, often, and he's always been there)--and I live my life a little more securely knowing that he's 'placed' in it. Such people occupy such large and orienting places in our lives--they're our maps as we navigate the feelings and thoughts created by experience--the people who occupy our time and focus and who let us know where and who we are.
And when such a person leaves our lives, we lose our sense of orientation--our sense of selves--grief is so often experienced as a sense of "What do I do now? Where do I go from here? How do I live--day to day--without this person?" And mostly, I think, we learn to function afterwards by living lives defined by absence. We leave that place in our lives--that orienting point--as empty, and function as best with can by projecting memories of that person into the empty space. Thinking about what the person would have said, would have done, what you would have felt, or thought, or done--because Having That Person There is How The World Is Supposed To Be. It's unpleasant, to be sure, but we can grow numb and make it through the day because even though our lives are defined by absence, they're still defined, which is better than chaos, right?
But of course by keeping a gap in our lives exactly the size and shape of the person means that, duh-huh!--no one and nothing can ever replace it. That our lives will forever be defined by absence. Which, as I say, is at best a numbly functional existence.
But letting go of that absent person is so goddamned scary. Because who are you without that person? How do you feel? What do you do? You'll be lost, won't you? Lost. Not good, that. And the more central the person, the more lost you'll be--the more of you there won't be, if you can follow.
But unless you can let that absence go--unless you can let the shape and space go fuzzy and let someone or something else in there--and let them be themselves, and not an awkward, forced, and ultimately doomed attempt to recreate the lost (Kim Novak falls off the bell-tower both times in Vertigo, remember)--then you'll never heal.
But it's a lot to give up--who you were, what you loved and cared for.
I have been living a life defined by absence.
But lately...less. It's good. Scary, and I keep running back every so often to check the place of the absence. But less and less often. And more and more--there are other places, one in particular, that have begun to feel like home to me. It's new. It's strange. It's exciting and uncertain and becoming less so. It's good. It's very, very good.
So, like that sweet, doomed whale, we create means of orientation. Points in space, time, and self about which we can say "That is There, I am Here, and This is How I Relate To It." Why else do you think so much of our language hinges on prepositions--words that exist only to articulate relations between things: "at," "from," "of," "to" and so on? Because in order to get our head straight, we have to put the rest of our world in order. Why else is moving homes so disturbing and stressful? Because it's a change of a lynchpin in how we organize the world--we think spatially--think about how every place in the world is, in ways distinct and vague, organized around the basic principle of 'where it is in relation to your home'--and not just in terms of geography. Our emotional lives are essentially matters of spatial orientation as well. Which--thank Christ--brings me to my point.
After traumatic losses, we lose our minds because we can't function without the presence of, say, our loved one--who that person was, what that person meant--that makes up too much of how we think about our lives as being ordered. Pause and consider, dear reader--don't you have someone who is, so to speak, your conscience--the eprson you consult whenever you're at a loss? Your dangerous side--the person you know you can go to for fun of the 'heh heh' variety? Your sense of humor--the person who 'gets' you and laughs at the same things in the same way and who you have to share every new joke immediately? Your something close and dear and meaningful--your sense of self in some embodied, beloved way? Bet you do. Bet you got a lot of them. I know I do. I have, for instance, one friend who is more of an achor to me than he'd ever be comfortable knowing--but he's the one I know I can go to when the s*** hits the fan (and it has, often, and he's always been there)--and I live my life a little more securely knowing that he's 'placed' in it. Such people occupy such large and orienting places in our lives--they're our maps as we navigate the feelings and thoughts created by experience--the people who occupy our time and focus and who let us know where and who we are.
And when such a person leaves our lives, we lose our sense of orientation--our sense of selves--grief is so often experienced as a sense of "What do I do now? Where do I go from here? How do I live--day to day--without this person?" And mostly, I think, we learn to function afterwards by living lives defined by absence. We leave that place in our lives--that orienting point--as empty, and function as best with can by projecting memories of that person into the empty space. Thinking about what the person would have said, would have done, what you would have felt, or thought, or done--because Having That Person There is How The World Is Supposed To Be. It's unpleasant, to be sure, but we can grow numb and make it through the day because even though our lives are defined by absence, they're still defined, which is better than chaos, right?
But of course by keeping a gap in our lives exactly the size and shape of the person means that, duh-huh!--no one and nothing can ever replace it. That our lives will forever be defined by absence. Which, as I say, is at best a numbly functional existence.
But letting go of that absent person is so goddamned scary. Because who are you without that person? How do you feel? What do you do? You'll be lost, won't you? Lost. Not good, that. And the more central the person, the more lost you'll be--the more of you there won't be, if you can follow.
But unless you can let that absence go--unless you can let the shape and space go fuzzy and let someone or something else in there--and let them be themselves, and not an awkward, forced, and ultimately doomed attempt to recreate the lost (Kim Novak falls off the bell-tower both times in Vertigo, remember)--then you'll never heal.
But it's a lot to give up--who you were, what you loved and cared for.
I have been living a life defined by absence.
But lately...less. It's good. Scary, and I keep running back every so often to check the place of the absence. But less and less often. And more and more--there are other places, one in particular, that have begun to feel like home to me. It's new. It's strange. It's exciting and uncertain and becoming less so. It's good. It's very, very good.
