A Dilemma
X-Boxing for 9 straight hours.
Staying up really late, drinkin' and tokin' and yellin' real loud over the ear-bleedingly thunderous club music.
Heroin. Oxycontin. Percocet.
Net porn. (Porn, period.) (Or, if you're into that sort of thing, Period Porn--like, daguerrotype-based stuff.)
Pizza.
All of these things? Things that you enjoy, but which don't make you feel good.
Now:
Exercise.
Salads as entrees.
Sitting down and writing that novel.
Reading your way through the Moralia of Plutarch.
Learning another language.
All of these things? Things that you fucking hate doing, but which make you feel really good.
Why is it, pray, that the things that we enjoy are almost invariably bad for us, while the things that we agonize our way through are all too often good for us? It's not a simple matter of instant gratification versus long-term payoff, since one who lives entirely for the moment is a self-destructive fool, but one who lives entirely oriented towards the future is losing precious moments of life that could be better spent in a more 'present' state of mind/body.
I think that the reason why we love sex is because it's one of the few things that feels good at the time and (STDs and emotional psychos aside) is good for us as well.
Do we live for the now or the then? If we live for the now, the then will never happen--the problem with living each day as if it were your last is that there is no more certain self-fulfilling prophecy. ("Hey, officer! Go fuck yourself and your pussy-ass costume! Do those come in men's versions? Yeah, that's right, pull out your gun--you ain't got the balls to use it!" And hello to the morgue attendants.) But to live for tomorrow is to live for a day that will never come, as the Buddha probably said on one of those days he was just phoning it in.
I know, alas, what I should be doing with my time/energy/life. I also know what I want to do with my time/energy/life. But one produces ennui, and the other guilt. I'm sure that somewhere out there, there's someone who can flip those emotions around to their positive equivalents, and to that person, let me just say: Fuck you and never cross my path unarmed.
Pleasure or progress. Enjoyment or achievement. Not an easy choice to make, and don't tell me to 'balance the two, silly,' because real achievement takes a hella lotta time and effort--Milton didn't write Paradise Lost whilst dicking around on the clavichord. ("But he was blind," you say. "Ray Charles? Stevie Wonder? Get a clue," I reply.) Devotion is the only path to achievement, and it involves a powerful sacrifice of pleasure. And yet, and yet, and yet--
I have no conclusion to all this. Hence the title--it's a dilemma, and there is no good answer. I'd continue to ponder, but as that's neither pleasurable nor productive, I would appear to be screwing myself twice over in doing so.
And people wonder why I'm generally saturnine.
Staying up really late, drinkin' and tokin' and yellin' real loud over the ear-bleedingly thunderous club music.
Heroin. Oxycontin. Percocet.
Net porn. (Porn, period.) (Or, if you're into that sort of thing, Period Porn--like, daguerrotype-based stuff.)
Pizza.
All of these things? Things that you enjoy, but which don't make you feel good.
Now:
Exercise.
Salads as entrees.
Sitting down and writing that novel.
Reading your way through the Moralia of Plutarch.
Learning another language.
All of these things? Things that you fucking hate doing, but which make you feel really good.
Why is it, pray, that the things that we enjoy are almost invariably bad for us, while the things that we agonize our way through are all too often good for us? It's not a simple matter of instant gratification versus long-term payoff, since one who lives entirely for the moment is a self-destructive fool, but one who lives entirely oriented towards the future is losing precious moments of life that could be better spent in a more 'present' state of mind/body.
I think that the reason why we love sex is because it's one of the few things that feels good at the time and (STDs and emotional psychos aside) is good for us as well.
Do we live for the now or the then? If we live for the now, the then will never happen--the problem with living each day as if it were your last is that there is no more certain self-fulfilling prophecy. ("Hey, officer! Go fuck yourself and your pussy-ass costume! Do those come in men's versions? Yeah, that's right, pull out your gun--you ain't got the balls to use it!" And hello to the morgue attendants.) But to live for tomorrow is to live for a day that will never come, as the Buddha probably said on one of those days he was just phoning it in.
I know, alas, what I should be doing with my time/energy/life. I also know what I want to do with my time/energy/life. But one produces ennui, and the other guilt. I'm sure that somewhere out there, there's someone who can flip those emotions around to their positive equivalents, and to that person, let me just say: Fuck you and never cross my path unarmed.
Pleasure or progress. Enjoyment or achievement. Not an easy choice to make, and don't tell me to 'balance the two, silly,' because real achievement takes a hella lotta time and effort--Milton didn't write Paradise Lost whilst dicking around on the clavichord. ("But he was blind," you say. "Ray Charles? Stevie Wonder? Get a clue," I reply.) Devotion is the only path to achievement, and it involves a powerful sacrifice of pleasure. And yet, and yet, and yet--
I have no conclusion to all this. Hence the title--it's a dilemma, and there is no good answer. I'd continue to ponder, but as that's neither pleasurable nor productive, I would appear to be screwing myself twice over in doing so.
And people wonder why I'm generally saturnine.
